Sony smartphone with PSP capabilities

March 8th, 2010 by Diana349 No comments »

PSP goThere are plenty of new gadgets to come out in the year 2010 but this new toy is neither  a net book, handheld console or an e-reader, but all three in one!  It has been said that Sony is to be releasing a new gadget that will incorporate all these features in one so that you the consumer will have all the latest games, books, and even access to social networking sites all in hand.

Sony after having problems with sales with their release of the PSPGo is now looking for something new to take away from the IPOD  and IPAD s attention. This Smartphone will be worked on by Sony Ericsson and will definitely impact the mobile market in a big way. This handheld will not need cartridges in order to play games but will connect to an online store such as the PlayStation 3. As of yet no word has been said on whether this new handheld will be able to support 3rd party gaming but I guess we will soon see what is in store for this new gadget that I’m sure will open many doors  for new technology thereafter.

Google and Microsoft: A battle for the clouds?

March 8th, 2010 by jrielly No comments »

m v. gRecently, Google announced the acquisition of DocVerse allowing for online collaboration on Microsoft Word, Excel and Powerpoint. A tremendous step because Google Apps and Office, “don’t play well together.”

Cloud computing is simply a way of computing on the internet that shares resources instead of using software. Clearly this was not in Microsoft’s business plan a couple year’s ago. Charging way too much for software has always been in the model. However, a section of Microsoft 2010 will have a free cloud based platform. Both Microsoft and Google both recognize that cloud computing will directly influence their new products and services.

Cloud computing is here to stay. In an increasingly globalized world the power to collaborate and edit in real time, cost effectively will be an invaluable business tool. This issue is at the heart of differences between Microsoft and Google. Google views the web as an application platform versus PC software and operating systems. One is the future. One was the future. We’ve all seen how heavily they marketed bing taking square aim at google. What we haven’t seen is very many people running to convert. In 2009 these companies faced off heavily. But the battle hasn’t even begun.

 

World’s Biggest Particle Accelerator

March 8th, 2010 by jrielly No comments »

Large Hadron Collider

The iPad’s Shortcomings

March 7th, 2010 by Matt T No comments »

http://www.macworld.com/article/145976/2010/01/ipadissues.html

The author of this article makes some very good points about the iPad’s capabilities, or, lack thereof.  In particular, the issue of multitasking.  As computers get sleeker, newer, faster, and processing power builds, we, as consumers, want computers that can do more and more things at once.  In this, the iPad is a colossal step back into the computer Stone Age with its limited multitasking capabilities.

I also agree strongly with what the author says about the lack of a video camera.  An overly gorgeous display, all but designed for video viewing, but no way to record, or even video chat?  The author offers the opinion that this is an intentional omission, something “held back” for iPad 2.0, and I couldn’t agree more.

Also, no Flash support?  Love it or hate it, Flash is a fairly common element on the Web today, and there are a great many sites that utilize Flash.  It’s not as bad as having a web browser that can’t handle html, but it’s not too far off.

I agree with the author of this article on almost every point he makes, with one exception.

He says, “with just a couple little tweaks, I can certainly see an iPad in my future.”  That’s the point upon which we differ.

Facebook vs. MySpace: Concerns on Social Networking

March 7th, 2010 by Matt T No comments »

Once upon a time, MySpace was THE social networking site on the Internet.  Back in June of 2006, it was the most popular social networking site in the United States.  In April of 2008, it was overtaken by its competitor, Facebook.  Despite advances in technology, however, both sites have always been on the receiving end of various types of criticism, most notably, the way they can make personal information overly publically accessible.

MySpace was created in August 2003 as an imitation of Friendster.  It was created by a number of eUniverse employees, among them Tom Anderson (everybody’s first MySpace friend) and had every advantage starting up due to being launched by eUniverse, which simply advertised MySpace to the 20 million eUniverse users, very quickly building a strong following.

Facebook, on the other hand, was initially only available to students at Harvard University (where its creators attended school), and was gradually expanded to include other Boston-area schools (including BC), and then ultimately to anyone aged 13 or over.  Currently, Facebook has more than 400 million users worldwide.

One of the major advantages of Facebook versus MySpace, for a long time, was the privacy features.  MySpace had an option to make one’s entire profile private or not, and only recently has begun to do more fine-tuning (choosing which features of one’s profile were going to be private vs. public).  Facebook, on the other hand, allows users to control virtually every aspect of their privacy.  This is a powerfully attractive feature, as one of the strongest criticisms of social networking sites is that it makes it easier for stalkers to stalk people.  However, on Facebook, many of these privacy features need to be “activated”, and as such, simply signing up for a Facebook account does not guarantee one the privacy one might wish for.  For maximum privacy, these settings need to be adjusted, and many less experienced users may not even be aware of how much of their profile content is publicly accessible.

Another  criticism of Facebook has been that it’s not as easy to “personalize” a profile as it is on MySpace.  On a MySpace profile, depending on one’s level of expertise, absolutely everything can be customized, while Facebook profiles tend to be much more static.  However, it’s always been this author’s opinion that excessive customization on MySpace profiles leads to the exact issues that too many external apps do; namely, the profile get bogged down, don’t load, and eat up phenomenal amounts of bandwidth.   Facebook has a much better integration of its “extra” features, like games, applications, etc.  With MySpace, loading those external apps tended to bog down one’s profile greatly, while on Facebook, all these things are neatly sorted.

Of course, both sites have faced their fair share of criticism (Wikipedia.com has a whole page dedicated to Facebook criticisms) for numerous issues, as no newly-emerging technology is perfect.  With so many users, these social networks are akin to vast cities, so inherently there will be issues.  While the creators of these sites do what they can to meet user demand, it’s also a responsibility of the users themselves to be aware, when in such vast cities, who they are in contact with, what kind of personal information they are sharing, and most importantly, how to prevent sharing information one would rather keep private.

Just like in any large city, users need to be aware of themselves and their surroundings at all time.  That’s just good common sense.

YouTube video concerning cyberstalking

One Small Step Against Spam….

February 27th, 2010 by John Lydon No comments »

Recently Microsoft convinced a US judge to issue a court order shutting down 277 internet domains infected with malware and being used by the Waledac botnet. It is estimated that 80% of unsolicited email originates from botnets and an estimate of 1.5 billion spam messages were being sent from these “zombie” computers everyday. In many cases the owners of these machines were entirely unaware that their computer was infected at all. Upon receiving the permission of US courts to disrupt this system, Microsoft severed the connection to most of these computers and cut off traffic to Waledac’s website. The effect of this action is however unclear as experts are divided as to the degree to which this has reduced worldwide spam proliferation. Richard Cox, the cheif information officer at the anti-spam service known as Spamhaus was quoted as saying “Waledac was not a high threat, its less than 1% of spam traffic.” Regardless public opinion is virtually unanimous in condoning this step as a favorable one. I personally see this as a small step towards success in the war against spam e-mail, but I am pessimistic about it having any long lasting effects. Spam it seems is the unintended negative consequence associated with the convenience of e-mail. People have resigned themselves to, in many cases, having to spend ten of fifteen minutes each day sifting through the morass of junk mail. As the world shifts away from the tangible mail of the past towards electronic mail the effects of this spam will become all the more widespread. True elimination of this problem would, however, require giving a few individuals a large degree of control over the internet, which many people are not willing to do at the moment. Perhaps, however, as more and more people turn to email as a main source of communication these attitudes towards spam will shift and harsher measures will be taken.

Do electronic kiosks work?

February 26th, 2010 by roadrunner No comments »

kioskimageWhen we look at successful electronic kiosks, what comes to mind are the types that promote advertizing, those that collect information and ATM’s. The question is, are there other uses for electronic kiosks now that handheld devices have become such an important part of our lives?

A group out of Connecticut has created a kiosk which they believe will introduce the generation of kiosks to the main-stream market. The group has designed a kiosk which will allow the use of tools we are familiar with such as using the internet and ordering products online, as well as collecting information from customers in order to sell to targeted business groups. Either to the retail partner where the kiosk is placed or to marketing groups which could use the information to send emails or mailers for selected products or offers.

So the question is will potential customers be interested in using such a kiosk to order products and become subjected to these marketing campaigns or are we more comfortable ordering products from the comfort of our own homes from sites where we usually do our shopping?

The technology aspect of these kiosks is interesting in its own as it does give companies the ability to offer more products, sizes and selection, than would be offered in their brick and mortar environment. It also offers stores the added use of the digital displays while customers are shopping, as additional advertising space, attracting customers to special offers or the latest products. Could this advertising space more valuable than the database of collected information or is the combination of the two which becomes that next generation of kiosks we will see in the malls, coffee shops, bars and in traditional retail stores themselves?

If we take a look at how technology has changes over the last 5-10 years, handheld devises have become the latest way of searching the internet and ordering products right from our mobile devices. In most cases we are comfortable linking our cells to websites and if we happen to be on campus or in a Starbucks or Penera, we might have to enter a little bit of information to gain access to the Wifi offered on-site, but it becomes second nature and accept the risks that come along with it. We know we might expect small amounts of spam from registering at a new location, but for the most part we know where the information or to whom, it is being offered to. With a kiosk in a mall, are we really sure who will get our personal information and have we as a collective, become leery of where we give what information?

No Such Thing as a Free Lunch; Google Buzz Encounters Privacy Issues

February 24th, 2010 by gwiegner No comments »

http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/hiner/?p=3822&tag=nl.e101

Over the last decade, Google has had the reputation of being the “golden child” in the tech world, claiming to put the needs of the users first, and being focused on engineering over profits.  Users have tacitly trusted Google to only use their information for explicit needs such as searching and emailing.   But the recent unveiling of Google Buzz is causing a privacy stir.  Within hours of its launch, Buzz was turning contacts most often emailed into Google Buzz Friends, exposing the world to the person’s Google profile.  In creating the automatic friends list, Google was trying to streamline the process of setting up a new social media site.  What the company thought was helpful turned out to be harmful.  Perhaps it has to do with age – younger users don’t think twice about personal information and pictures so readily accessible.  The older set feels more strongly about one picture of them with a beer in their hand haunting them in their next life.   The bottom line is, your privacy is sacrificed as soon as you register for a free email service or social website.  I think I’ll buck up and go back to RCN.dp_privacy_500

New Technology = New Garbage

February 23rd, 2010 by jsymonds No comments »

Everyday is seems like a new piece of technology comes out, and another one of your possessions gets outdated. It’s getting harder to keep up with the “latest new thing”. Pressure on people to always be updating their electronics has led to a giant surge of E-waste. E-waste is the surplus, obsolete, or broken electronic devices that become un-discard able garbage. Although it is great for the economy that people have to update things like cell phones, computers, televisions, and especially refrigerators, the dark side of the matter is that nobody knows what to do with the rest of it.

Although there are laws and regulations in the U.S. the prevent people from irresponsibly disposing of outdated goods, there are many countries that just don’t really care about the problem. What ends of happening is there are mass amounts of E-waste that are shipped off to these developing countries and improperly disposed of. You would be surprised how many poisonous materials go into the making of these products and even more surprised at how close in contact people are coming to them.

A child sits amoungst a pile of wires and E-waste

A child sits amoungst a pile of wires and E-waste

By 2020, E-waste levels in some of the most affected countries (Including India, South Africa and China) will increase by some 500 percent. Not all countries are suffering from imported waste, in fact, China has banned imported E-waste, but is still suffering in its own toxins being the number two contributor to the problem, second to the United States. In 2010 China produced 2.3 million tons of E-waste, U.S. produced 3 million.

Toxins in computers include barium, beryllium, cadmium, hexavelent chromium, lead, mercury, phosphorus, and PCBs. In China, a popular form of disposal is burning the waste, which released deadly toxins into the air. Children actually play in the mountains of trash that has accumulated in their backyards. Some computer manufacturers such as Dell, HP, and Apple have committed to making more eco friendly computers in response to pressure from local organizations such as Greenpeace.

Maybe the UN can band together and set some international laws in stone. Awareness of the subject is increasing and hopefully we wont be seeing those predicted numbers ten years from now.

Read from:

UN: Tidal Wave of E-Waste Poisoning Developing Nations


On Technewsworld.com

Kindle Dwindle

February 22nd, 2010 by cdepina No comments »

 

 

 

CNet.com article: Feb 18, 2010kindle-for-blackberry

Amazon recently announced they released a new Blackberry app which allows users to download the Kindle software to purchase and read books on their Blackberry.  Two other mobile devices where the Kindle application is presently available are the IPhone and the IPod Touch.  Plans to offer this application to Macs and the IPad are currently in the works.  The idea behind this move is to take an advantage over other eBook distributors like  Barnes and Noble by allowing other hardware to operate the software and increasing the availability.  The Kindle is priced at $259 and is sold exclusively through Amazon.  The Blackberry download is free and the average cost for purchases is $9.99. 

While it does expand the product availablity, I believe that it actually hurts Amazon. 

They developed the Kindle to enter a previously vacant market.  By enabling use on different hardware, it actually deters consumers from buying an actual Kindle.   I believe that this is just a lazy attempt to try and hold on to the eBook market without having to invest money to create upgrades to the already existing Kindle.  I believe they had a great idea and other brands such as Barnes and Noble and even Apple  thought so too, hence why they have manuevered into the eBook reader market.  A little investment and innovation could propel their original idea into the dominating hardware.  Instead I get the sense that Amazon is smelling blood in the water and it’s their own.  They have one thing going for them.  Flexibility.  An appealing feature is that once you purchase a book from them you can read it on a Blackberry, Kindle, Ipod Touch/IPhone, and Windows PCs.  This offers greater flexibility in minimizing the amount of gadgets you carry on a daily basis.   Personally, this alone is attractive as I have one or more of the devices that support the Kindle software.  This is also appealing to customers who might not typically buy the Kindle.  As a Blackberry user, I can’t imagine that this would be good to use for long term reading.  The screen on a Blackberry isn’t very big.  So the text would be small and very hard to read or large and would take longer to read.  In addition, depending on the model of Blackberry, the battery life might not last as long. 

I think that Amazon should stop playing the game conservatively and just go for it.  They have generated enough of a customer base to make changes to their current hardware offering by listening to their customer needs and develop a Kindle product tailored more towards what their customers want and what would convert new potential customers.  In order to maintain an edge means that you have to change.  If not, Amazon runs the risk of being overshadowed by hardware manufacturers who develop deals with the publishers directly vs. dealing with Amazon.