Archive for March, 2010

And your point is?

March 16th, 2010

Columnist for CNET.com, Matt Asay, recently wrote the following opinion of the growing deluge of data being accumulated on the internet by the incessant creations from users of all types over even the most mundane aspects in their lives. He argues, but does not prove, that perhaps there is a downside to all of this accumulated electronic information, even equating it to a potential shortage of fuel or timber towards the end of his article.

While it is unlikely that this is true in my opinion, for an author that is so concerned with the prevalence of useless mutterings over the internet, this article seems only to add to it. Without making a point he introduces a subject only to refute and then re-suggest it in a matter of two or three lines.

To be sure there are facts of interest and significance strewn throughout this piece. One such example is the observation of declining costs associated with hard-drive space and physical database hardware that are occurring while simultaneously the increasing cost of “indexing and searching” the internet are increasing. The problem with these statements are that everyone already knows them, a contributor of his status might better serve his readers therefore by offering some suggestions as to how these onslaughts of data might be avoided or improved upon. Instead we have simply one more article to add to “the digital debris” of our time.

The coming broadband overhaul…

March 16th, 2010

PipelineRecently, the Federal Communications Commission let it be known that they want to increase the availability of high-speed internet access throughout the United States. In addition they have made plans to increase the speed of this internet access by over 1000% on average. They argue that the United States lags far behind other developed countries in its availability of broadband access and that improving on it would not only help ensure America’s competitive technological edge, but also in the meantime provide a much-needed source of economic stimulus in the short run.

While the utopian vision of a country intimately connected through miles of high speed internet access cable may seem appealing to the common internet users like you and I, it is proving much less so to the companies that already control internet and pricing speeds. These companies are currently enjoying the benefits associated with owning and operating the virtual entirety of the broadband spectrum in the United States. The F.C.C. has proposed an auction as a means of compensating these companies for their sacrifice in the name of national internet efficiency, but the details of this suggestion have many details to be worked out before a viable solution and agreement is reached by all parties in this matter.

A more pressing issue in my mind however is if the government should be interfering in this manner at all. The development of a single internet provider, while improving service at first, may in the end deter innovation and development in the very field it has meant to stimulate. Secondly, can a government currently touting 1-2 trillion dollar budget deficits and the potential loss of its triple A credit rating, really meaningfully talk of economic stimulus through government spending anymore.

The internet will improve, as most technological elements of society do, on its own terms, without the intervention of government regulation and stimulus. Furthermore it may manage to do is in a more cost effective and innovative way than is being suggested here. In a period of such economic risk, we simply can’t afford this luxury.

Here is the DEAL..

March 15th, 2010

If someone told you that doing several things on a phone is impossible, just tell him or her ” No way Jose” because now Microsoft just announce the WINDOW PHONE 7 SERIES that could do that. First of all I want to congratulate Microsoft for keeping up with Apple.  The new Window  phone 7 series  is a great tool.  by introducing this phone, Microsoft is going to show that they are working as hard as Apple to satisfy their customers.

The Shape is nice and simple. the way I see it I even think that it is lighter than the Iphone.  on the bottom it has a laft arrow, on the right hand side it the loop icon and the most interesting thing is most of the other have the house icon or menu icon, not this phone. this phone has the window icon in the middle. I am telling you this phone is pretty cool.

the phone can do a lot of works, such as  Multitasking, which is a huge thing. for instance if one is listening to music and you want to browse the web one can still be able to listen to his or her music and still be able to browse. I think personally is a plus, Here is a quote about what Mr.Joe Belfiore, who is the Corporate Vice President. He said “It’s highly likely we will suspend (applications running in the background) when a device gets to a low memory state. Microsoft also announced on Monday that Windows Phone 7 Series will have a push notification system that allows programs to get updates and alert the user even when they are not running..”.   that’s a plus. this one the reason why I think if I was going to buy the phone, that would have been my target.  here is a video link that I add on it so it could be easier for you.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dM4X-KveSs

My conclusion is so simple go in check it out when it comes out..

The End of the Wii Era???

March 15th, 2010

In the spring of 2006 in Kyoto, Japan, a first look of the Wii console was given to reporters from all around the world. The TIME’s Lev Grossman was one of these journalists and one of his first reactions to the console was that no one would ever buy it. Now Nintendo has sold as many Wiis as Microsoft and Sony have sold Xbox 360s and Playstation 3s put together.

In June of 2009, Microsoft announced a new technology, like the Wii, using motion sensing. But could this new theology named Project Natal actually be better than the beloved Wii? For hard-core gamers the Xbox 360 is great because it has good graphics, games and online service. So what’s the problem? Its casual gamers like myself and many others, who have problems with the controller. It has two joysticks, two triggers, two bumper buttons and much more little unknown buttons. The Wii on the other hand is very easy to manage; it’s just like waving a wand.

Microsoft could have come up with similar technology to the Wii, but instead they took it up a step with Project Natal. Project Natal’s next step up? No controller at all, to deal with. Your control remote is your arms and legs, and other body parts; so the gamer becomes the controller. The module has a camera that tracks where your body is and what you’re doing. Along with all this, it can also find your body’s various joints, keep track of multiple players and can tell apart your clothes from the wallpaper in your living room. This module can even tell when you’re talking to it or amongst your friends. The result is genius, it puts you in the game in a way no other home system has done yet.

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1902208-2,00.html

The iPad’s Looming Identity Crisis

March 15th, 2010
Anytime a new device comes to market I am usually one of the first to find out all the important facts about the product or service in order to determine if its going to make my life easier or simplify some facet of my day to day routine.  The trouble is, when it comes to the iPad, I have an issue understanding why it exists or more to the point, I really don’t know where it fits in world as we know it.

Mind you I am not a first to market kind-a-guy, even if I like what I see I am not going out to buy it the same day but rather I will wait until the second generation comes out.  Of course I can direct this to several thoughts; maybe it’s the hope the price will come down quickly, maybe it is my letting the company work out all the bugs first or it could be my waiting to see if the product has a real place in my life.

So here I am, watching the latest generation of Apple commercials, scouring the internet reading articles about iPad’s buzz and attempting to piece together a reason why I would want or need this device?  Still, the gadgets I have already bought and paid for, feel like enough for me right now; a new high-def flat screen TV, a powerful computer and an iPhone…  Where does this new iPad device fit?  First of all, what is it?

In searching for a better understand of how it was meant to make my life easier, I happened across this article which sums up the point and issue with the product.  The article discusses the issue consumers have with “different” devices and why their future could be short lived.

http://www.technewsworld.com/story/69465.html

iPad

iPad

The article offers a simple way of explaining how the iPad didn’t have a clear purpose, saying, “People could not look at the iPad and instantly state its principal, core functionality like they could for the rest of Apple’s product line.”  Frankly that’s it in a nutshell, this is an item we really do not need for a specific task and to add paying for a monthly service on top of the core product, especially in these financially difficult times, I and many others would have to agree the iPad does not seem to have a place in our world at this time.

Give the iPad some credit; it is a good looking product with some functionality, at really not a bad price.  I am sure that over time a company and/or service will apply the technology to their business model in order to attract customer or enable their clients to achieve their result more efficiently.  The corporate world will need to be the one who saves it by adapting it to their business and developing further functionality and application.  However for the average everyday consumer, I really do not see a practical application for the iPad, nor any reason to buy today’s newest gadget.

Battery problems for the iPad…

March 14th, 2010

http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20100313/tc_pcworld/ipadswappedifitsbatteryfailsapplesays

This article proves a good point.  Battery issues with the iPad is a very costly thing to fix.  Apparently, it has been said that the cost to fixing the battery issue is expansive with a whopping  $99 and  $6.95 shipping fee.  If you battery can not hold its charged you are asked to arrange with Apple for an exchange.  At least Apple is doing the right thing and telling us up front.

What’s the point in buying a iPad (the one in all) if the batteries stink!   Seems to be that Apple is trying to get its money out of the people to “experiment” on us, and then make us pay for their inability to provide a $500 phone with a decent battery.

And as the author stated, “Apple warns that replacement iPads won’t come with any of your personal information and suggests you sync your old device with iTunes to backup your data before sending it in.”  Really Apple? is this the kind of reputation you really want for you new iPad?iPad TV Commercial – 2010 Oscars

Sony smartphone with PSP capabilities

March 8th, 2010

PSP goThere are plenty of new gadgets to come out in the year 2010 but this new toy is neither  a net book, handheld console or an e-reader, but all three in one!  It has been said that Sony is to be releasing a new gadget that will incorporate all these features in one so that you the consumer will have all the latest games, books, and even access to social networking sites all in hand.

Sony after having problems with sales with their release of the PSPGo is now looking for something new to take away from the IPOD  and IPAD s attention. This Smartphone will be worked on by Sony Ericsson and will definitely impact the mobile market in a big way. This handheld will not need cartridges in order to play games but will connect to an online store such as the PlayStation 3. As of yet no word has been said on whether this new handheld will be able to support 3rd party gaming but I guess we will soon see what is in store for this new gadget that I’m sure will open many doors  for new technology thereafter.

Google and Microsoft: A battle for the clouds?

March 8th, 2010

m v. gRecently, Google announced the acquisition of DocVerse allowing for online collaboration on Microsoft Word, Excel and Powerpoint. A tremendous step because Google Apps and Office, “don’t play well together.”

Cloud computing is simply a way of computing on the internet that shares resources instead of using software. Clearly this was not in Microsoft’s business plan a couple year’s ago. Charging way too much for software has always been in the model. However, a section of Microsoft 2010 will have a free cloud based platform. Both Microsoft and Google both recognize that cloud computing will directly influence their new products and services.

Cloud computing is here to stay. In an increasingly globalized world the power to collaborate and edit in real time, cost effectively will be an invaluable business tool. This issue is at the heart of differences between Microsoft and Google. Google views the web as an application platform versus PC software and operating systems. One is the future. One was the future. We’ve all seen how heavily they marketed bing taking square aim at google. What we haven’t seen is very many people running to convert. In 2009 these companies faced off heavily. But the battle hasn’t even begun.

 

World’s Biggest Particle Accelerator

March 8th, 2010

Large Hadron Collider

The iPad’s Shortcomings

March 7th, 2010

http://www.macworld.com/article/145976/2010/01/ipadissues.html

The author of this article makes some very good points about the iPad’s capabilities, or, lack thereof.  In particular, the issue of multitasking.  As computers get sleeker, newer, faster, and processing power builds, we, as consumers, want computers that can do more and more things at once.  In this, the iPad is a colossal step back into the computer Stone Age with its limited multitasking capabilities.

I also agree strongly with what the author says about the lack of a video camera.  An overly gorgeous display, all but designed for video viewing, but no way to record, or even video chat?  The author offers the opinion that this is an intentional omission, something “held back” for iPad 2.0, and I couldn’t agree more.

Also, no Flash support?  Love it or hate it, Flash is a fairly common element on the Web today, and there are a great many sites that utilize Flash.  It’s not as bad as having a web browser that can’t handle html, but it’s not too far off.

I agree with the author of this article on almost every point he makes, with one exception.

He says, “with just a couple little tweaks, I can certainly see an iPad in my future.”  That’s the point upon which we differ.