Archive for the ‘Education’ category

Web is among world’s ‘destructive’ technologies

February 22nd, 2010

Sam Harris is the author of the New York Times bestsellers, The End of Faith and Letter to a Christian Nation. He was recently aked a question by CNN producer John D. Sutter while at TED Conference in Long Beach, California.

The question was what is the most destructive technology on the planet? Surprisingly, he answered that the internet is. He did say that its not necessarily the internet but what we can use the internet for that is dangerous and destructive. Here is the full article.

I do not agree with him in the sence that the internet is not a problem at all. The problem is us humans and what we do with it. It is up to our conscious and intelligence to use any tool for the betterment of humanity. A perfect example of this is the atomic bomb. Yes its purpose was for mass destruction. But it also ushered in the atomic age. We now have nuclear power plants that provide us with much cleaner energy than other methods. When the arrow was invented, it probably was invented for hunting, yet it was also used for war.

Any new technology has the potential to be used for both good and bad. We have always had to choose between those two options. Nothing has changed. What we really need to worry about is to educate ourselves about the internet and its diversity and put it to good use.

Alysson Luiz Bastos

Is Google Making Us Stupid?

February 22nd, 2010

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google

In this article, the author Guy Billout writes that the internet is actually decreasing our intelligence. While Billout certainly does make a good argument that the internet has hurt our ability to stay focused on one thing, I think he is forgetting a number of benefits. In the article he states that he often finds himself drifting after two or three pages of reading online while years ago he was able to easily drift into wordy writing. The author interpreted this loss of concentration as a loss of intelligence, while I believe it is an evolutionary new way of thinking. With information available to us at our fingertips we not required to search for long periods to get simple answers; Google has made us smarter. We are now more efficient than ever at finding everything we need answers for. I don’t think the internet has made us stupid, it has just changed the way we think.

While I think it is appropriate to argue that this new way of thinking has negative side effects, I believe the benefits outweigh the detriments. I have access to the intelligence of anyone who uses the internet while im connected. Typing a question into Google is like asking millions of people a question, then instantaneously getting the best response of the group. I thought Google did an excellent job showing this in their recent Superbowl commercial. They showed that having this new ability allows you to solve problems quickly then spend your time on whatever else you choose. If you prefer to read lengthy explanations and feel as though that will increase your intelligence, you still have that option. Our brain automatically decides what is the best way to learn what information we’re searching for. That now means quickly jumping around between stories with the new, easy access.

Google is making life more efficient

Google is making life more efficient

Video Game Graphics…Is it too real?

February 21st, 2010

6CAC3LI0VCAQJE2FRCAFRYFWLCAR5NM2ACA8AA3NYCALZED4JCAWBG2Y6CAVA16IOCA1AV3E9CACYER41CACKJ0VPCAHLKA57CA3B81SECAAYD0QLCAJSFVIBCAA7IPEPCAUR744WCAQLVYELCADI5KP0We have come a long way from Atari and Nintendo…In the attached article  “Video Games: A Cause of Violence and Aggression” , the author discusses the connection of possible violence and transgression of young people and adults with the new video games and graphics that are so realistic. Many of the video games are not only geared for children, but are also targeted to the adult poplulation as well. There are warning labels for all ages: “Real-life violence” and “Not appropriate for children 12 and younger”.

However, there are many children that come home after school with no adult supervision because both parents need  to work. Also many children go to their friends’ homes after school or day care provider where the family rules on playing video games may be different from their own. I’m not saying that all children who play video games become addicted and may become violent or angry. Many children can separate themselves from video to reality. Most children that play xbox or other game devices are involved in school, on the honor roll, they play sports, and they remain active.

There are however, children who may be loners, may not have many friends, may be bullied at school, may not have the support of a parent or adult–Maybe they need to find a way to ‘escape from reality’.  They may feel their only way of feeling ’in control’ is by playing video games where there is violence.  It’s a place they can vent their anger or frustration.

This article  addresses the two boys from Columbine who claimed the lives of fellow students before taking their own lives. Although they say no one really knows why the boys did such a horrific act, it was known that these boys were obsessed with the video game ‘Doom’. They had customized their video game to only have two shooters, and also to have enough ammunition –so that their victims could not fight back. A year later, these two boys dressed in trenchcoats and carried out their fantasy into the real world and did an unthinkable act.

I think it’s such a fine line as their are violent television programs, there is ‘reality’ television–which in most cases–is ’not real’, but children have access to hundreds of channels.  The television can be a babysitter to many kids whose parents just don’t have the time to spend with them, and unless channels are screened or blocked, the children have the remote with all kinds of shows–They see and watch violence all the time–it’s in the daily news, the war in Iraq. It’s in their neighborhoods. This article also states, however, that violent video games are more harmful than movies or  t.v. programs they watch because of the interactive and engrossing nature.

Game graphics have improved with age and technology. I think some of these games are extremely disturbing, but I also know that many adults and children play them and enjoy them, and it will NOT have any negative impact on them. I also believe that we, as parents need to have better control on what our children watch. I think we need to monitor the kinds of games they are playing–and I think no one knows more than a parent if their child is well-rounded, confident,  and interacts well with people . I think a parent knows what games are appropriate and/or age-appropriate for them to play.

However, for those parents who may have a child that is insecure, lashes out easily, may be angered or depressed , or maybe the family unit is broken or maybe their child has been bullied, or maybe you don’t want to admit it, but they are the bully. Try and keep communication lines open. Keep an eye on games  and limit the times your child plays them.  Watch and tune into the friends they hang out with. Shut the t.v. off and spend quality time with your child. Talk with them and be open with them. Find suitable age-appropriate games that they find fun and entertaining  and find ones that you can play together.

As a wise old man once said to me,  ”Everything in moderation”. I think that’s true with everything we do…

Are Textbooks Doomed?

February 4th, 2010

cclasspictureThe impending launch of Apple’s ipad has generated much discussion on the wave of future technological trends.  But some predict that its biggest impact will be on higher education.  Thus far e-text books have been slow to permeate college campuses, but the ipads popularity, or lack thereof, may determine the fate of printed material in university classrooms.

According to a January 31 article in the “Chronicle of Higher Education”, only 2 percent of students bought an e-textbook last semester.  This may be attributed in large part to lack of awareness that so many titles are available in electronic form.   The question remains if this number will grow as companies increase their marketing efforts.

Many schools are already experimenting with e-text books and some are trying to speed this process with mixed degrees of success.  Northwest University launched a pilot program using the Sony PRS505 e-reader model but ultimately determined the design insufficient.  They hope that the ipad, which more closely resembles a laptop, but has a 9.7- inch screen and is easier to carry, will prove more suitable.  Its 10-hour battery life also surpasses that of the Sony, Kindle and other e-readers.

NorthWest President Dean Hubbard is convinced that “students will read more and learn more” using the electronic medium.   But survey results are conflicting.  CourseSmart, a digital textbook company, reports that 72 percent of customers would buy at least a portion of their textbooks on line in the future.   However, a survey conducted by the Student Public Interest Research Group found nearly the opposite with 75 percent of students preferring traditional text and 22 percent citing discomfort reading on a screen.  Another barrier to the acceptance of e-textbooks is the current lack of a single compatible platform.   Students are reluctant to invest in multiple hardware and software for differing texts.

Given the still evolving technology it is difficult to say that the textbook is doomed.  While e-text books are in the long-run more cost efficient (they cost about ½ the price printed versions) and easier to tout to class, standard textbooks still have advantages.  For many, the physical act of highlighting reinforces learning.  While e-readers may be suitable for reading a novel, the act of studying differs.

For these reasons I personally hope that the market for textbooks will remain strong.  I recognize, however, that students are fast becoming used to the electronic format.  Perhaps there is room in the market for both.